Agree/disagree with this statement. Give at least two examples and/or counter-examples to defend your view.
1. Technology is an inherently positive force..
2. Technology is an inherently negative/threatening force.
3. Technology is apolitical (not political).
4. How do you define progress?
.
.
In-Class Notes on technology 10/26/09
1. Technology is an inherently positive force.
Stuff
Media
Communicate faster
Be informed
Missing kids/amb3er alert
Less panic, more informed, not ignorant
Satellites, see what’s going on everywhere
Tech—jobs,
Incr education level?
Medicine – cures, vaccines,
Transportation—bus, carpool
Catch criminals, improve society
Lose: human contact, socialization, human costs…
Consumed by technology
2. Technology is an inherently negative/threatening force.
Losing jobs
People replaced by machi9nes
Businesses quicikly outdated
Weapons–?
–kill people
Cars, pollution,
Global warming, co2 emissions,
3. Technology is apolitical (not political).
Marketed toward everyone—
–fridge, limited by soc, energy
–Computer – access,
–class lines
Stem cell research—
Money decides—people with money decide–what gets funded/expanded
Military tech ok
Monopoly of tech by few people with polit/econ power
Medicine, transp restricted based on politics
Scie, eng, tech,
All on purpose, what we don’t see is on purpose too.
4. How do you define progress?
Advancement in positive or negative direction
Internet,
Lose contact
Manufacturing,
Economics
Neg: exploiting peole with lousy jobs, cel phones connected every minute, separation.